Wednesday 4th March: Renee Conroy, Department of Philosophy, Purdue
University at Calumet: 鈥楻ust Belt Ruins鈥�
Venue: Seminar Room, 1 Newnham Terrace, Darwin College. (Enter by main door).
Time: 5.00pm to 7.00pm
Admission is free, and all are welcome.
Abstract: American political satirist P. J. O鈥橰ourke observes,
鈥淒etroit鈥檚 industrial ruins are picturesque, like crumbling Rome in an
18th century etching鈥�. I argue that O鈥橰ourke鈥檚 claim should be taken
literally: the crumbling pockets of urban decay that famously dot major
cities in America鈥檚 so-called 鈥渞ust belt鈥� belong to the aesthetic
category 鈥榬uins鈥�. While sites of recent urban devastation have a
distinctive aesthetic character, they are nonetheless of an appreciative
piece with those iconic structures from ancient times we relish in
virtue of their incompleteness and their capacity to incite sustained
reflection on things past.
The body of literature in this corner of aesthetics remains
unfortunately small, but one shared thesis emerges clearly from extant
work in this area, viz., that age-value is central to our aesthetic
regard for ruins. Hence, according to the traditional model, sites of
contemporary ruination in places like Detroit, Michigan do not count as
genuine ruins. They are, at best, ruins in a metaphorical or analogical
sense. By considering carefully Carolyn Korsmeyer鈥檚 recent account of
ruins as objects of aesthetic regard (Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, Fall 2014), I argue that philosophers of art have overlooked
an important appreciative category 鈥� that of 鈥渞ust belt ruins鈥� 鈥� and
that this category can be subsumed under traditional theories of ruin
appreciation.