Edited by Thorsten Botz-Bornstein and Giannis Stamatellos
To be published by Brill/Rodopi in the 鈥淧hilosophy of Film鈥� Series
Can Neoplatonic philosophy be used for film studies? Given the often-stated parallels between Plotinus鈥� and Bergson鈥檚 philosophies, it is surprising that Neoplatonism has provided relatively little input on philosophy of film. Curtis Hancock writes that the effects of Bergsonism are evident in pragmatism, psychology, and theology and that the decedents of Bergson have created a vestige of Neoplatonism that perdures into the late twentieth century. This vestige must also exist in film studies. Today, with the newly emerging observative 鈥淐inema of Contemplation,鈥� this Neoplatonic vestige is worth exploring. The following points (as well as others) can be developed:
1. Contemplation. Plotinus鈥� search for the 鈥渋ntelligible鈥� that can be grasped neither by mere sense perception nor by abstraction or analysis, leads to 鈥渟imple鈥� contemplation: 鈥淪uch vision is for those only who see with the soul鈥檚 sight鈥攁nd at the vision, they will rejoice, and awe will fall upon them and a trouble deeper than all the rest could ever stir, for now they are moving in the realm of Truth鈥� (鈥淥n Beauty,鈥� Enn. I, 6, 4). Can a theory of 鈥渃ontemplative cinema鈥� be built upon those ideas? Who contemplates? The viewer? The film? Read more here:
http://www.botzbornstein.org/#!plotinus-and-film/c17gb
Send abstracts (ca. 800 words) to thorstenbotz@hotmail.com and gstamap@yahoo.com.
Deadline for abstracts: Sept. 30 2015.
Deadline for final papers: June 30 2016.